Note: this article will talk about sex. And be rather disgusting.  So be sure to send your thanks to New Hampshire representative Nancy Elliott.

So I was reading my twitter feed today, and noticed a tweet from ZJ. Now if you don't know ZJ, you should head over to ZJ's youtube page. If you're an athiest, you'll love ZJ even more. ZJ's videos are pretty much about disproving religion, but that's not what the tweet today was about. When you watch one of ZJ's video, you'll know why I like them so much. (have you noticed I've been avoiding pronouns ?) ZJ hasn't disclosed what pronouns they like to use, or whether they identify as genderqueer or something else. Bascially, ZJ doesn't limit themself to one gender.

Anywho, so I'm browsing through my feed, and I saw this:

http://zjemp.tv/elliott. So bascially, the New Hampshire representative Nancy Elliott decided to describe sex between two males as:

"taking the penis of one man and putting in the rectum" and "wiggling it around in excrement".

Now, some people may go for that kinda thing, but I'm willing to bet that excrement isn't always involved, especially when preforming anal sex correctly ...  and that there's more than just wiggling ... and that fact that she didn't mention a condom ... I'm not too thrilled about.  I recommend using a condom.

I think we can all come up with our own descriptions of anal sex, yes? Including anal sex between a man and a woman. Or even using a dildo or other device. Hehe. If we use Nacy Elliott's guildlines for describing sex, we might as well describe heterosexual sex as (per ZJ):

"Your choice to portray this act of sex by reducing it to a mere assortment of body parts was clearly intended to give the impression that two men making love is indecent and repulsive (and, by extension, so is the idea of two men simply being in a relationship). This is a dishonest and misleading tactic. Any kind of sex can be made to seem absurd by the use of vivid descriptions of genitals, motions, bodily fluids, and so forth. Indeed, the act of heterosexual vaginal intercourse sounds just as bizarre when it is described as "taking the penis of a man and pushing it up into the vulva and wiggling it around until he leaves a pool of sticky white goo sitting inside the vaginal canal"."

No wonder I'm gay. Hehe. So what are your thoughts?

This Twitter Wire brought to you by Socialite for OS X.

Comments

Razorbeak
02-23-2010

I swear, I think we are actually moving backward as a society at this point. It seems that we are entering a new intellectual dark age. People just can't keep their hyper-judgmental, ridiculous thoughts to themselves anymore.

Go get 'em ZJ.

---

Only registered users can write comments!

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."